
As I wonder how to introduce this issue, poetry enters my
mind:
The "Settlement with Reservation" is complete,
Intervenor Duck ain't part of the Deal;
If anybody challenges then just repeat,
The old Permanent Injunction as if it was real!
$168,872.45 for "NOT SUING MY UNION" ain't bad,
Mere "chicken feed", if you'll pardon the pun;
Fight'in Bob's reputation is saved and he is glad,
His future legal fees to be paid as they come!

The alleged, illegal "Settlement Agreement and
Release" was negotiated by Sac-C and Monty without the knowledge on any Executive
Board Member or any member of the UTU. "u" determine if it was in
"u're" best interest and if "u" are governed by it, i.e., will
"u" be able to read "The Evidence"
when it appears?
Well, there it is, kinda "crooked" (no pun
intended) sometimes, but, hell, "u" be "Da Judge"? Ah, again a picture
is worth a 1000 words? Would two pictures be worth 2000 words? From the Earley
Edition of the El Paso Express, June 1997:


Sac-C understands Article 16 of the UTU Constitution!
"u" da man, "u" decide? Is it
"u're" Union at work?