If "u" think the Referee appears a "little"
miffed - he was. He had just spent a half an hour arguing for Smoot's claim before finally
giving in to the wishes of the Union and Carrier! How would "u" feel when
"u" learned "u" were returned to service without back
pay because that's what the union representatives wanted!
As a practical matter, this may be worse than the Smoot sell out
because it involves an out of service employee rather than one seeking merely $2300 in
Stock options. On the other hand, Smoot's case was decided in his favor by the final
and binding Board of Appeals (not even appealable to the Convention) wherein the decision
basically detroyed the purpose and intent of many Articles in the UTU Constitution.
Wanna sue Clint? Opps, I forgot - Ruck's not party to the
alleged, illegal "Settlement Agreement and Release", is he?
How about you fight'in bob - you want to go back to Economus and
tell him the illegal, IF NOT IMPROPER evidence is back - I need injunctive relief to
insure re-election one more time? I can promise you two things - a separate
countersuit this time and no more "pro se"! Hang in there and have a nice
day!