2003 BIG 12 POSITION RANKINGS
OFFENSIVE BACKFIELD RECEIVERS OFFENSIVE LINEMAN
TEAM PLAYERS AVE TEAM PLAYERS AVE TEAM PLAYERS AVE
1. OKLAHOMA 4 6.38 1. TEXAS 4 7.50 1. TEXAS A&M 5 6.80
2. COLORADO 4 5.00 2. NEBRASKA 3 5.17 2. OKLAHOMA 4 5.75
3. MISSOURI 3 4.50 3. OKLAHOMA 3 4.83 3. COLORADO 4 5.50
4. TEXAS TECH 3 4.17 4. KANSAS ST 3 4.67 4. NEBRASKA 4 5.00
5. OKLA ST 4 4.13 5. MISSOURI 6 4.42 5. MISSOURI 5 3.80
KANSAS ST   DNQ 6. COLORADO 3 4.17 6. KANSAS ST 3 3.17
IOWA ST   DNQ 7. OKLA ST 9 3.39 7. IOWA ST 6 2.75
BAYLOR   DNQ  8. IOWA ST 4 3.38 8. KANSAS 6 2.67
NEBRASKA   DNQ  9. BAYLOR 5 2.80 8. TEXAS TECH 5 2.60
KANSAS   DNQ 10. KANSAS  4 2.25 10. OKLA ST 4 2.50
TEXAS   DNQ TEXAS A&M   DNQ 11. BAYLOR 6 2.25
TEXAS A&M   DNQ TEXAS TECH   DNQ TEXAS   DNQ

 

2003 BIG 12 POSITION RANKINGS
DEFENSIVE LINEMAN LINEBACKERS DEFENSIVE BACKFIELD
TEAM PLAYERS AVE TEAM PLAYERS AVE TEAM PLAYERS AVE
1. OKLAHOMA 5 7.90 1. OKLAHOMA 3 9.67 1. OKLAHOMA 4 7.63
2. TEXAS A&M 5 5.70 2. TEXAS A&M 3 8.17 2. TEXAS 7 7.07
3. OKLAHOMA ST 6 4.50 3. KANSAS 4 3.50 3. COLORADO 6 4.42
4. NEBRASKA 3 4.50 4. TEXAS TECH 3 3.17 4. MISSOURI 4 3.75
5. COLORADO 4 3.50 4. KANSAS ST 3 3.17 5. TEXAS A&M 7 3.71
6. MISSOURI 3 3.00 6. IOWA ST 4 2.88 6. KANSAS ST 7 3.64
7. KANSAS 5 2.90 BAYLOR   DNQ 6. OKLA ST 7 3.64
8. KANSAS ST 4 2.88 TEXAS   DNQ 8. NEBRASKA 6 3.50
9. TEXAS TECH 3 2.83 MISSOURI   DNQ 9. TEXAS TECH 9 3.17
10. IOWA ST 4 1.88 NEBRASKA   DNQ 10. KANSAS 5 2.80
11. BAYLOR   DNQ COLORADO   DNQ 11. IOWA ST 5 2.60
12. TEXAS   DNQ OKLA ST   DNQ 12. BAYLOR 7 2.57